Elon Musk’s long-term compensation structure at Tesla has often been described by analysts as virtually impossible to achieve. To unlock the full extent of his stock-based award—originally valued up to $1 Trillion (and adjusted to roughly $824 Billion following recent share issuances)—Tesla is required to hit staggering benchmarks over a 10-year horizon.
However, corporate governance experts and reports from the Wall Street Journal have highlighted a specific contractual loop: Tesla doesn’t actually need to deliver 20 million cars or 1 million Optimus robots if it gets acquired or merged.
The Fine Print: “Change in Control” Exception
According to Tesla’s 2025 CEO Performance Award Agreement filed with the SEC, Section IV outlines an overriding exception that transforms the entire reward mechanism:
Normal Path:
Market Cap Targets + Operational Targets (20M EVs + 1M Robotaxis + 1M Optimus) ➔ Payout Vests
Merger / Acquisition Path (Change in Control):
Operational Targets ARE WAIVED ➔ Payout Depends ONLY on Acquisition Price
If Tesla enters a definitive transaction involving a Change in Control—such as a mega-merger with SpaceX—the rigid operational deliverables vanish.
| Compensation Path | Requirements | Target Deliverables | Valuation Target |
| Organic Performance | Operational + Financial | 20M Vehicles, 1M Robotaxis, 1M Optimus | Up to $8.5 Trillion |
| Change in Control (Merger) | Valuation Only | DISREGARDED (Waived) | Based on Combined Deal Price |
Why a SpaceX and Tesla Combination Is Gaining Traction
Speculation around a potential combination between SpaceX and Tesla has escalated following several structural developments:
- SpaceX Public Currency: Following SpaceX’s public listing and its previous acquisition of xAI, SpaceX now possesses public equity currency necessary to execute large-scale stock-for-stock transactions.
- Operational Overlap: Tesla and SpaceX already share joint infrastructure, including the TERAFAB semiconductor facility in Texas, as well as cross-integration of xAI’s Grok into Tesla vehicles and Optimus robotics.
- Voting Power Alignment: Consolidating the entities allows Musk to maintain a dominant voting share across his AI, EV, and space exploration ecosystems—a priority he has repeatedly stated publicly.
While executive pay experts note that “getting bought” simplifies the mathematical hurdle for vesting stock options, a merger between two companies where the CEO holds controlling influence presents significant board and regulatory hurdles:
- Valuation Fairness: Independent Tesla shareholders would need to evaluate whether SpaceX’s valuation relative to Tesla represents fair exchange value.
- Conflict of Interest Scrutiny: Transactions between entities under common leadership face strict judicial and board review to ensure arm’s-length fairness.
Read – Teledyne Technologies to Acquire Varex Imaging in $1.1 Billion All-Cash Deal.